Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida

581 So. 2d 192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5271, 1991 WL 87269

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2704

StatusPublished

This text of 581 So. 2d 192 (Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida, 581 So. 2d 192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5271, 1991 WL 87269 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a non-final order appointing a receiver. We affirm.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver. See Interdevco, Inc. v. Brickellbank Savings Association, 524 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner, 99 Fla. 987, 128 So. 241 (1930).

It was not error for the trial court to require only the receiver to post a bond. Shops of Sunset, Ltd. v. Cohen, 551 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Boyd v. Banc One Mortgage Corp., 509 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI