Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida

581 So. 2d 192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5271, 1991 WL 87269

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1991·No. No. 90-2704·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a non-final order appointing a receiver. We affirm.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver. See Interdevco, Inc. v. Brickellbank Savings Association, 524 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner, 99 Fla. 987, 128 So. 241 (1930).

It was not error for the trial court to require only the receiver to post a bond. Shops of Sunset, Ltd. v. Cohen, 551 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Boyd v. Banc One Mortgage Corp., 509 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a non-final order appointing a receiver. We affirm.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver. See Interdevco, Inc. v. Brickellbank Savings Association, 524 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner, 99 Fla. 987, 128 So. 241 (1930).

It was not error for the trial court to require only the receiver to post a bond. Shops of Sunset, Ltd. v. Cohen, 551 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Boyd v. Banc One Mortgage Corp., 509 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida, 581 So. 2d 192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5271, 1991 WL 87269 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

581 So. 2d 192 (Mandel v. First Union National Bank of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related