Mandel v. Brodsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandel v. Brodsky

200 Misc. 344, 106 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2253

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1951

StatusPublished

This text of 200 Misc. 344 (Mandel v. Brodsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandel v. Brodsky, 200 Misc. 344, 106 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There can be no question but that section 164 of the Civil Practice Act as amended in 1934 (L. 1934, ch. 504), governed the service of the summons in this proceeding in 1936. The case of Schulte Real Estate Co. v. Pirkig (191 Misc. 926), therefore, does not apply.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and judgment reinstated.

Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Hoestadter, J., concurs in result.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI