Mandel v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Mandel v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co.

188 Ill. App. 227, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 483

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 2, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 Ill. App. 227 (Mandel v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandel v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co., 188 Ill. App. 227, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 483 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Appeal and ebbob, § 1538*—when giving of incomplete instruction not reversible error. The giving of an instruction which stated: “The jury are the judges of the questions of fact in the case, and the court does not by any instruction given to the jury in this case intend to instruct the jury how they should find any question of fact in this case,” held not reversible error for the reason it did not state “from the evidence in the case under the instructions of the court,” where the jury were fully instructed and the error could not have misled the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Appeal and ebbob, § 1538*—when giving of incomplete instruction not reversible error. The giving of an instruction which stated: “The jury are the judges of the questions of fact in the case, and the court does not by any instruction given to the jury in this case intend to instruct the jury how they should find any question of fact in this case,” held not reversible error for the reason it did not state “from the evidence in the case under the instructions of the court,” where the jury were fully instructed and the error could not have misled the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 Ill. App. 227, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandel-v-bloomington-normal-railway-light-co-illappct-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack