Mandel Tobacco Co. v. State Tax Commission

58 A.D.2d 930, 397 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13130
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 21, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 930 (Mandel Tobacco Co. v. State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mandel Tobacco Co. v. State Tax Commission, 58 A.D.2d 930, 397 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which sustained the imposition of a tax on cigarettes pursuant to article 20 of the Tax Law. Petitioner, a wholesale deáler in tobacco products, as a registered agent of the State Tax Commission, is authorized to affix tax stamps on cigarettes (Tax law, § 472). In a burglary of petitioner’s premises, more than 32 cases of unstamped cigarettes were stolen. The sole issue herein is whether petitioner was properly held liable for the tax on those stolen cigarettes. The cigarette tax is imposed upon "all cigarettes possessed * * * for sale” (Tax Law, § 471, subd 1). While it is true that the "ultimate * * * liability for the tax shall be upon the consumer” (Tax Law, § 471, subd 2), the tax is clearly levied at the time the cigarettes are possessed for sale and, as such, we cannot say that respondent’s determination is not supported by substantial evidence or that it is arbitrary or capricious. As a practical matter, to accept the petitioner’s argument that the tax is not owing unless and until the stamps are physically affixed to the cigarettes would almost certainly encourage agents, in order to insure themselves against cigarette tax liability in the event of theft, to wait until the last minute before affixing the stamps. Such delay would, as respondent points out, hinder its inspection and enforcement efforts (see Lewiston-Auburn United Grocers v Johnson, 253 A2d 338 [Me]). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City Line Candy & Tobacco Corp. v. Commissioner
141 T.C. No. 13 (U.S. Tax Court, 2013)
Schwartz v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
228 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Harder's Express, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
93 Misc. 2d 449 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 A.D.2d 930, 397 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandel-tobacco-co-v-state-tax-commission-nyappdiv-1977.