Mandel & Co. v. Rado
5 A.D.2d 780, 170 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7296
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1958
StatusPublished
This text of 5 A.D.2d 780 (Mandel & Co. v. Rado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mandel & Co. v. Rado, 5 A.D.2d 780, 170 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
Opinion
In an action for a judgment declaring the present force and effect of certain restrictive covenants, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits after trial. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 780, 170 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandel-co-v-rado-nyappdiv-1958.