Mancuso v. Graham
Opinion
| Mancuso v Graham |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 05269 |
| Decided on June 28, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 28, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
107 CA 18-00064
v
DOUGLAS S. GRAHAM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
ALDERMAN AND ALDERMAN, SYRACUSE (RICHARD B. ALDERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
NANCY L. DYER, SYRACUSE, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS. (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Martha Walsh Hood, A.J.), entered November 22, 2017. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a Domestic Relations Order.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Mancuso v Graham ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [June 28, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: June 28, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2019 NY Slip Op 5269 (Mancuso v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.