Mancuso v. Bellerive
This text of 50 A.D.2d 802 (Mancuso v. Bellerive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 6, 1975, which denied its motion for a severance of the third-party action. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Under the facts in this case, a trial of all causes of action before the same jury would subject the third-party defendant to some prejudice (Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603; Be Luca v Schlesinger, 39 AD2d 566). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order appealed from, with the following memorandum: The two cases relied upon in the memorandum of the majority herein (Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603; De Luca v Schlesinger, 39 AD2d 566) are not in point. In the instant case, issue was joined in August, 1972 and the third-party complaint was served [803]*803in December, 1972. A note of issue was filed in March, 1974. Appellant waited until the eve of trial before proceeding, by notice of motion dated January 30, 1975, to move for a severance. Under the circumstances, I do not believe that Trial Term abused its discretion in denying the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 802, 375 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancuso-v-bellerive-nyappdiv-1975.