Home/New York Court of Appeals/Mancuso v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCHENECTADY CITY SCH. DIST.

Mancuso v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCHENECTADY CITY SCH. DIST.

128 N.E.2d 422, 309 N.Y. 726
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 8, 1955
StatusPublished

This text of 128 N.E.2d 422 (Mancuso v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCHENECTADY CITY SCH. DIST.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mancuso v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCHENECTADY CITY SCH. DIST., 128 N.E.2d 422, 309 N.Y. 726 (N.Y. 1955).

Opinion

309 N.Y. 726 (1955)

Ettore Mancuso, Appellant,
v.
Board of Education of Schenectady City School District, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 27, 1955.
Decided July 8, 1955

Ettore Mancuso, appellant in person.

Orrin G. Judd, Abraham S. Clayman and Earle K. Moore for respondent.

Daniel E. Kelly for Board of Education of the Rye City School District, amicus curię, in support of respondent's position.

Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Henry S. Manley, Ruth Kessler Toch and Milton Alpert of counsel), in his statutory capacity under section 71 of the Executive Law.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mancuso v. Board of Education
309 N.Y. 726 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 N.E.2d 422, 309 N.Y. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancuso-v-bd-of-educ-of-schenectady-city-sch-dist-ny-1955.