Mancino v. State
This text of 986 So. 2d 662 (Mancino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph Sal MANCINO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Joseph Sal Mancino, Defuniak Springs, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of the trial court dismissing Joseph Sal Mancino's amended rule 3.850 motion. The case is remanded *663 for the trial court to consider the substance of the forty-two page motion. We have considered the State's citation to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla. 2007), but find its application premature.
Reversed and remanded.
SHAHOOD, C.J., STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
986 So. 2d 662, 2008 WL 2987043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancino-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.