Mancini v. Unso

263 A.D. 742, 31 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of consumption of pork infected with trichina, and for loss of services and for expenses, order, in so far as it grants plaintiffs’ motion for examination before trial of defendant Wilson & Co., Inc., modified on the law by striking therefrom item “ c ” with respect to the scope of the examination of said defendant, and by striking from item “ b ” the word might ” and inserting in place thereof the words “ was intended to.” As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days notice. There is no allegation in the complaint which would make item “ c ” a material subject of inquiry. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mancini v. Unso, 263 A.D. 742, 31 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

263 A.D. 742 (Mancini v. Unso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Posner v. Nova Table Pad Co.
28 Misc. 2d 946 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)