Mancini v. State

789 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9806, 2001 WL 803563
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2001·No. No. 4D01-853·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the denial of Wayne Mancini’s motion to correct illegal sentence in which he made a facially sufficient claim that his sentencing guidelines scoresheet improperly added points for counts for which he had been sentenced as a habitual offender. The case is remanded for further proceedings on the merits of Mancini’s motion.

We again reject the state’s argument that denial was required because Mancini did not physically attach a copy of his scoresheet to his motion. See Ferguson v. State, 746 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

POLEN, C.J., WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mancini v. State, 789 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9806, 2001 WL 803563 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 1207 (Mancini v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. State
746 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)