Mancinelli v. Pyrofax Gas Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mancinelli v. Pyrofax Gas Corp.

37 A.D.2d 826, 325 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 826 (Mancinelli v. Pyrofax Gas Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mancinelli v. Pyrofax Gas Corp., 37 A.D.2d 826, 325 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 3, 1971, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, to strike from the. complaint all claims except for that of negligence, and otherwise affirmed, and plaintiff shall, within 20 days after service upon him by defendant-appellant of a copy of the order entered hereon, serve an amended complaint in conformity herewith. The supplemental amended complaint, to which the cross motion to dismiss was directed, contains a fifth unitary cause stating claims of several kinds, all of which, save only that for negligence, are outlawed by the Statute of Limitations. Since the affirmative defensive plea of the statute is all embracing as to the claims lumped together in the fifth cause, defendant’s motion for a summary judgment based on the statute is effectively partially granted by the relief hereby afforded. Concur—■ Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich. Nunez, Murphy and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 3, 1971, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, to strike from the. complaint all claims except for that of negligence, and otherwise affirmed, and plaintiff shall, within 20 days after service upon him by defendant-appellant of a copy of the order entered hereon, serve an amended complaint in conformity herewith. The supplemental amended complaint, to which the cross motion to dismiss was directed, contains a fifth unitary cause stating claims of several kinds, all of which, save only that for negligence, are outlawed by the Statute of Limitations. Since the affirmative defensive plea of the statute is all embracing as to the claims lumped together in the fifth cause, defendant’s motion for a summary judgment based on the statute is effectively partially granted by the relief hereby afforded. Concur—■ Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich. Nunez, Murphy and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 826, 325 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancinelli-v-pyrofax-gas-corp-nyappdiv-1971.