Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mancine v. State

Mancine v. State

95 So. 3d 412, 2012 WL 3192734, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-274
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 3d 412 (Mancine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mancine v. State, 95 So. 3d 412, 2012 WL 3192734, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, in which he challenges the Department of Corrections’ application of his court-ordered jail credit. Defendant should first exhaust his administrative remedies through the Department of Corrections. See Ward v. State, 974 So.2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). If he is not satisfied with the Department’s ruling, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate court. See Robinson v. State, 818 So.2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
818 So. 2d 543 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Ward v. State
974 So. 2d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 3d 412, 2012 WL 3192734, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancine-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.