Mancilla v. Mukasey
This text of 304 F. App'x 627 (Mancilla v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[628]*628MEMORANDUM
Juan Martin Gomez Mancilla and Maria Margarita Ramos Martínez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying their second motion to reopen as untimely filed.
Petitioners have waived any challenge to the BIA’s order, denying their motion to reopen, by failing to raise any arguments related to the BIA’s dispositive determination that the motion to reopen was untimely. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 F. App'x 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancilla-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.