Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co.

10 R.I. Dec. 13

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJune 30, 1933

DocketNo. 88243

StatusPublished

This text of 10 R.I. Dec. 13 (Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co., 10 R.I. Dec. 13 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

POULIOT, J.

The question of liability in this cause has been decided in the rescript filed in the companion case No. 88244.

If the plaintiff were entitled to recover, the amount of damages awarded, $2500, would not be excessive, it appearing that the plaintiff has already spent around $1900 and that the plaintiff’s wife will need more medical attention for an undetermined period.

Defendant’s motion for a new trial is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POULIOT, J.

The question of liability in this cause has been decided in the rescript filed in the companion case No. 88244.

If the plaintiff were entitled to recover, the amount of damages awarded, $2500, would not be excessive, it appearing that the plaintiff has already spent around $1900 and that the plaintiff’s wife will need more medical attention for an undetermined period.

Defendant’s motion for a new trial is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 R.I. Dec. 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manchester-v-united-electric-railways-co-risuperct-1933.