Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co.

10 R.I. Dec. 13

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 30, 1933·No. No. 88243·Published

Opinion

POULIOT, J.

The question of liability in this cause has been decided in the rescript filed in the companion case No. 88244.

If the plaintiff were entitled to recover, the amount of damages awarded, $2500, would not be excessive, it appearing that the plaintiff has already spent around $1900 and that the plaintiff’s wife will need more medical attention for an undetermined period.

Defendant’s motion for a new trial is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POULIOT, J.

The question of liability in this cause has been decided in the rescript filed in the companion case No. 88244.

If the plaintiff were entitled to recover, the amount of damages awarded, $2500, would not be excessive, it appearing that the plaintiff has already spent around $1900 and that the plaintiff’s wife will need more medical attention for an undetermined period.

Defendant’s motion for a new trial is granted.

Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co., 10 R.I. Dec. 13 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

10 R.I. Dec. 13 (Manchester v. United Electric Railways Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.