Manchester v. Scardazio

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Manchester v. Scardazio

6 R.I. Dec. 179

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJune 6, 1930

DocketNo. 80148

StatusPublished

This text of 6 R.I. Dec. 179 (Manchester v. Scardazio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manchester v. Scardazio, 6 R.I. Dec. 179 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a re-bearing of a demurrer of defendant, sustained by tbis Court.

Upon a careful examination of tbe brief filed by attorney for tbe plaintiff, the Court declines to re-open said matter and tbe demurrer to said declaration is sustained.

Plaintiff may have fifteen days from tbe date hereof to amend declaration.

Plaintiff’s exception is hereby noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a re-bearing of a demurrer of defendant, sustained by tbis Court.

Upon a careful examination of tbe brief filed by attorney for tbe plaintiff, the Court declines to re-open said matter and tbe demurrer to said declaration is sustained.

Plaintiff may have fifteen days from tbe date hereof to amend declaration.

Plaintiff’s exception is hereby noted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 R.I. Dec. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manchester-v-scardazio-risuperct-1930.