Manchester v. Scardazio

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Manchester v. Scardazio

6 R.I. Dec. 179

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 6, 1930·No. No. 80148·Published

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a re-bearing of a demurrer of defendant, sustained by tbis Court.

Upon a careful examination of tbe brief filed by attorney for tbe plaintiff, the Court declines to re-open said matter and tbe demurrer to said declaration is sustained.

Plaintiff may have fifteen days from tbe date hereof to amend declaration.

Plaintiff’s exception is hereby noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a re-bearing of a demurrer of defendant, sustained by tbis Court.

Upon a careful examination of tbe brief filed by attorney for tbe plaintiff, the Court declines to re-open said matter and tbe demurrer to said declaration is sustained.

Plaintiff may have fifteen days from tbe date hereof to amend declaration.

Plaintiff’s exception is hereby noted.

Manchester v. Scardazio, 6 R.I. Dec. 179 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

6 R.I. Dec. 179 (Manchester v. Scardazio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.