Manchester v. Hodge

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Manchester v. Hodge

64 A. 23, 73 N.H. 617, 1906 N.H. LEXIS 44

DecidedMay 2, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A. 23 (Manchester v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manchester v. Hodge, 64 A. 23, 73 N.H. 617, 1906 N.H. LEXIS 44 (N.H. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The defendants’ objections to the form of the proceeding can be obviated by the plaintiffs filing by way of amendment such counts at law as may be necessary to determine the question of right. Whether upon the facts the plaintiffs may be entitled to equitable as well as legal relief can be determined when the facts are settled. The decision of the question as to the proper form of procedure does not appear to be essential to the rights of the parties. That question, therefore, is not considered. The plaintiffs have leave to amend.

Case discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Guriam.

The defendants’ objections to the form of the proceeding can be obviated by the plaintiffs filing by way of amendment such counts at law as may be necessary to determine the question of right. Whether upon the facts the plaintiffs may be entitled to equitable as well as legal relief can be determined when the facts are settled. The decision of the question as to the proper form of procedure does not appear to be essential to the rights of the parties. That question, therefore, is not considered. The plaintiffs have leave to amend.

Case discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A. 23, 73 N.H. 617, 1906 N.H. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manchester-v-hodge-nh-1906.