Manchester v. Burlingame

40 App. D.C. 44, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 2050
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 1913
DocketNo. 399
StatusPublished

This text of 40 App. D.C. 44 (Manchester v. Burlingame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manchester v. Burlingame, 40 App. D.C. 44, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 2050 (D.C. Cir. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We are of the opinion that there is no sufficient ground for allowing the special appeal prayed for. In denying the application it is not to be inferred that the court has passed upon the effect of the order made in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 App. D.C. 44, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 2050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manchester-v-burlingame-cadc-1913.