Manchester Saw Mills v. Wood

77 So. 921, 16 Ala. App. 327, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 9
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 1918
Docket6 Div. 388.
StatusPublished

This text of 77 So. 921 (Manchester Saw Mills v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manchester Saw Mills v. Wood, 77 So. 921, 16 Ala. App. 327, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 9 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The only question presented by this record is the insistence by the defendant that on all the evidence it was entitled to the general affirmative charge. The rule in this state is that where there is any conflict in the testimony, questions of fact must be presented to the jury. We have examined the evidence, and are of the' opinion that the facts testified to were properly submitted to the jury, under the charge of the court.

This case relating to questions of fact only, the opinion will not be published, under authority of Acts of the Legislature of 1915, p. 595, § 3.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 921, 16 Ala. App. 327, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manchester-saw-mills-v-wood-alactapp-1918.