Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Novack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Novack

268 So. 2d 182

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1972

DocketNo. 72-1222

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 2d 182 (Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Novack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Novack, 268 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for certiorari, the petitioners seek review of an order of the trial court refusing to permit counsel for one of the defendants therein to withdraw on the eve of a trial.

We fail to find any departure from the essential requirements of law by the trial court in the denial of the motion, in light of the state of the record and the trial date at the time the motion to withdraw was presented to him. Fisher v. State, Fla.1971, 248 So.2d 479; Foley v. Peckham, Fla.App. 1971, 256 So.2d 65; State ex rel. Branch v. DuVal, Fla.App. 1971, 249 So.2d 468.

At the time of oral argument on the petition, the court was informed that the trial had, in fact, been postponed. Therefore, the denial of this petition for certiorari shall be without prejudice to the counsel attempting to withdraw to present a new motion to the trial court.

Petition for certiorari denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI