Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess

114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 A.D.2d 1013 (Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess, 114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injuries to property arising from road construction, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), entered April 25, 1985, as denied their motion to vacate the demand of defendant County of Dutchess for a bill of particulars.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, motion granted and the demand of defendant County of Dutchess for a bill of particulars vacated.

The demand for a bill of particulars includes requests for evidentiary material, and this court will not involve itself in pruning the improper requests from the proper requests (see, Nazario v Fromchuck, 90 AD2d 483). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for injuries to property arising from road construction, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), entered April 25, 1985, as denied their motion to vacate the demand of defendant County of Dutchess for a bill of particulars.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, motion granted and the demand of defendant County of Dutchess for a bill of particulars vacated.

The demand for a bill of particulars includes requests for evidentiary material, and this court will not involve itself in pruning the improper requests from the proper requests (see, Nazario v Fromchuck, 90 AD2d 483). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manchester-deli-inc-v-county-of-dutchess-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack