Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess

114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54058
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 25, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injuries to property arising from road construction, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), entered April 25, 1985, as denied their motion to vacate the demand of defendant County of Dutchess for a bill of particulars.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, motion granted and the demand of defendant County of Dutchess for a bill of particulars vacated.

The demand for a bill of particulars includes requests for evidentiary material, and this court will not involve itself in pruning the improper requests from the proper requests (see, Nazario v Fromchuck, 90 AD2d 483). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess, 114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 1013 (Manchester Deli, Inc. v. County of Dutchess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Posh Pillows, Ltd. v. Hawes
138 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Simpson Electric Corp. v. Leucadia, Inc.
130 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)