Manchac v. State

527 So. 2d 854, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1361, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2476, 1988 WL 56580
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 1988·No. No. 4-86-0628·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant has not shown entrapment as a matter of law; and we conclude there was also no error in the other points raised by appellant.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. SALMON, MICHAEL H., Associate Judge, dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manchac v. State, 527 So. 2d 854, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1361, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2476, 1988 WL 56580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

527 So. 2d 854 (Manchac v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lusby v. State
507 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Marrero v. State
493 So. 2d 463 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cruz v. State
465 So. 2d 516 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)