Mancebo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mancebo v. State

793 So. 2d 1093, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 2001 WL 912803

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-1474

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 793 So. 2d 1093 (Mancebo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mancebo v. State, 793 So. 2d 1093, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 2001 WL 912803 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentences for armed robbery with a firearm. We affirm.

We fínd no error in the trial court’s conduct of the Neil and Melbourne¹ inquiries attendant to the State’s peremptory challenge of a venire member, and the defendant’s objection to that challenge. See Heggan v. State, 745 So.2d 1066, 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that where transcript of voir dire clearly indicates that judge accepted state’s valid proffered neutral reason to support exercise of peremptory challenge, “compliance with Melbourne analysis does not require the incantation of magical words.”).

Finding no merit in the remaining points on appeal, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentences for armed robbery with a firearm. We affirm.

We fínd no error in the trial court’s conduct of the Neil and Melbourne¹ inquiries attendant to the State’s peremptory challenge of a venire member, and the defendant’s objection to that challenge. See Heggan v. State, 745 So.2d 1066, 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that where transcript of voir dire clearly indicates that judge accepted state’s valid proffered neutral reason to support exercise of peremptory challenge, “compliance with Melbourne analysis does not require the incantation of magical words.”).

Finding no merit in the remaining points on appeal, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

793 So. 2d 1093, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 2001 WL 912803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mancebo-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack