Mance v. United States
This text of 32 Cust. Ct. 493 (Mance v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, supra; and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Cust. Ct. 493, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mance-v-united-states-cusc-1954.