Mancaroso v. Cuthbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mancaroso v. Cuthbert

224 A.D. 754

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1928·Published

Opinion

Appellant.— Order denying motion lo vacate subpoena reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the subpoena vacated and set aside, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the proceeding had lapsed and no jurisdiction existed for the issuance of the subpoena, and the proceeding could not be revived without notice to the judgment debtor. (Matter of Wilson v. Bracken, Nos. 1 & 2, 150 App. Div. 577.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant.— Order denying motion lo vacate subpoena reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the subpoena vacated and set aside, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the proceeding had lapsed and no jurisdiction existed for the issuance of the subpoena, and the proceeding could not be revived without notice to the judgment debtor. (Matter of Wilson v. Bracken, Nos. 1 & 2, 150 App. Div. 577.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Mancaroso v. Cuthbert, 224 A.D. 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

224 A.D. 754 (Mancaroso v. Cuthbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related