Manca, Inc. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 446
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271 →
United States Customs Court·Decided December 22, 1959·No. No. 63628; protest 315448-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise designated as “Near focusing devices” on the invoice accompanying the entry are necessary for the operation of Leica cameras, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manca, Inc. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 446 (cusc 1959).
43 Cust. Ct. 446 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.