Manca, Inc. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 372
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271 →
United States Customs Court·Decided October 16, 1959·No. No. 63444; protests 58/8437, 58/8438, and 58/8439 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” or “O” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for photographic lenses and the items marked “B” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manca, Inc. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 372 (cusc 1959).
43 Cust. Ct. 372 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manca, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)