Manca, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 370
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271
United States Customs Court·Decided May 13, 1959·No. No. 63032; protests 320350-K, 320351-K, and 320352-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

[371]*371Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of negative eyepieces, which are photographic lenses, and the items marked “B” consist of parts of photographic cameras, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for photographic lenses and the items marked “B” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manca, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1959).

42 Cust. Ct. 370 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.