Manca, Inc. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271 →
United States Customs Court·Decided December 10, 1958·No. No. 62570; protests 286686-K and 330321-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the merchandise was dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for, and the items marked “B” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for photographic lenses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manca, Inc. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1958).
41 Cust. Ct. 442 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manca, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)