Manca, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271
United States Customs Court·Decided June 17, 1958·No. No. 62084; protests 292049-K and 292050-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is. similar in all material respects to that the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 1551, as modified by T. D. 52739, supplemented by T. D. 52820, supra, for photographic cameras; the items marked “B” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for photographic lenses; and the items marked “C” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 of the tariff act as photographic cameras, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manca, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 603 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 603 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manca, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)