Manbeck v. Jones

42 A. 536, 190 Pa. 171, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1001
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 27, 1899
DocketAppeal, No. 328
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 42 A. 536 (Manbeck v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manbeck v. Jones, 42 A. 536, 190 Pa. 171, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1001 (Pa. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of tbe specifications of error. The case was well tried, and the questions involved were correctly decided. For reasons given by tbe learned trial judge in his opinion, we are satisfied he was right in concluding that the plaintiff was entitled to equitable relief, and in adequately providing therefor by the terms of the decree from which tins appeal was taken. There appears to be nothing in any of the questions involved that requires extended discussion.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knudson v. Leach
458 A.2d 1140 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1983)
Senior & Schindel, Inc. v. Czinka
70 Pa. D. & C.2d 313 (Somerset County Court of Common Pleas, 1974)
Trimble Services, Inc. v. Franchise Realty Interstate Corp.
285 A.2d 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Penn's Woods Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Klinetob
51 Pa. D. & C.2d 672 (Columbia County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Wenrich v. Miller
211 A.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Fleck v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.
156 A.2d 832 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
O'DWYER v. Ream
136 A.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Tosh v. Witts
113 A.2d 226 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Snyder v. Bryson
71 Pa. D. & C. 463 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Hunter v. McKlveen
45 A.2d 222 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Heffley v. Lohr
27 A.2d 275 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Zbyszinsky v. Lopopolo
170 A. 362 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Ciski v. Wentworth
172 N.E. 276 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1930)
Lafleur Et Ux. v. Zelenko
141 A. 603 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1928)
Harpster v. Robinson
91 Pa. Super. 404 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Borough of Summerhill v. Sherbine
88 Pa. Super. 419 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Campbell v. Duggan-Rider Co.
5 Pa. D. & C. 119 (Erie County Court Common Pleas, 1924)
Blauser v. Carson
74 Pa. Super. 223 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Penman v. Jones
100 A. 1043 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Shedd v. American Maize Products Co.
60 Ind. App. 146 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A. 536, 190 Pa. 171, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manbeck-v-jones-pa-1899.