Manayunk Trust Co. v. Platt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Manayunk Trust Co. v. Platt

70 A. 721, 221 Pa. 248, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 473

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 11, 1908·No. Appeal, No. 380·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The motion to open a judgment being an appeal to the equitable powers of, the court should be based on some equitable ground shown. In this case there was none. The judgment was regular on its face and not assailable at law. The only objection to it now set up is of technical irregularity not in any way affecting its merits or justice. The court was not called upon to intervene.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The motion to open a judgment being an appeal to the equitable powers of, the court should be based on some equitable ground shown. In this case there was none. The judgment was regular on its face and not assailable at law. The only objection to it now set up is of technical irregularity not in any way affecting its merits or justice. The court was not called upon to intervene.

Judgment affirmed.

Manayunk Trust Co. v. Platt, 70 A. 721, 221 Pa. 248, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 473 (Pa. 1908).

Pincite

70 A. 721 (Manayunk Trust Co. v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related