Manas v. Central Surety & Insurance
This text of 266 N.W. 780 (Manas v. Central Surety & Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue on this appeal is whether or not the order from which the appeal is taken is, under the statute, an appealable order. Subs. (1) and (2), sec. 274.33, Stats., provide:
“Appealable orders. The following orders when made by the court may be carried by appeal to the supreme court:
“(1) An order affecting a substantial right, made in any action, when such order in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken.
“(2) A final order affecting a substantial right made in special proceedings or upon a summary application in an action after judgment.”
The appellant contends that the ruling upon the plea in abatement operated as a complete dismissal of the action as to it, and that the statute of limitations has run against the alleged cause of action for fraud. The order here appealed from does not come within either provision of the statute above quoted. We must, therefore, hold that it is not an appealable order and the appeal must be dismissed. This court could act in the premises only under its supervisory powers. That question is not here for consideration at this time.
By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 N.W. 780, 221 Wis. 381, 1936 Wisc. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manas-v-central-surety-insurance-wis-1936.