Manansingh v. United States
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA CHANDAN MANANSINGH, an No. 2:20-cv-01139-DWM individual, and ANGELA NAIRNS, an individual, Plaintiffs, ORDER
VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.
In 2017, United States District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II determined that the probation officers involved in this case did not have reasonable suspicion to search Plaintiffs’ residence. See United States v. Manansingh, 281 F. Supp. 3d 1096 (D. Nev. 2017), aff'd 733 F. App’x 390 (9th Cir. 2018). IT IS ORDERED that on or before May 23, 2025, the parties shall each file
a brief of no more than five pages addressing the preclusive effect, if any, of that decision. DATED this 13" day of May, 2025.
DonaldW. Molloy, District Judge United States [District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manansingh v. United States (Manansingh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.