Manahan v. City of Englewood

157 A. 654, 10 N.J. Misc. 75, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 1
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manahan v. City of Englewood. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 N.J.L. 249
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 31, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The prosecutrix sued out a writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the First Judicial District Court of Bergen county awarding defendant possession of certain premises in the city of Englewood. That judgment was reversed by this court. Prosecutrix now seeks a writ of restitution commanding the defendant to put her in possession of said premises.

■ It appears that the writ of certiorari was allowed on the day that the warrant for possession was issued. It was [76]*76executed on the same dajr and prior to notice to defendant- and the officer executing the warrant.

It is not made to appear that the lease was not lawfully terminated for breach thereof, and that any of the rights of prosecutrix respecting the property have been violated by her dispossession. McQuade v. Emmons, 38 N. J. L. 397.

The application is denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manahan v. City of Englewood, 157 A. 654, 10 N.J. Misc. 75, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 1 (N.J. 1931).

157 A. 654 (Manahan v. City of Englewood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.