Manager of Revenue of Jackson County v. Hoorfar

Missouri Court of Appeals

Manager of Revenue of Jackson County v. Hoorfar

370 S.W.3d 683, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2012 WL 3079141

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 2012·No. No. WD 74139·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Krishna Rajanna applied to recover the surplus funds generated by Jackson County’s tax sale of a piece of real property, claiming he was entitled to the proceeds because he was the assignee of a deed of trust secured by the property. The circuit court rejected Rajanna’s application, and instead awarded the excess funds to the property’s record title holder. Rajanna appeals. We affirm. Because a published [684] opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Krishna Rajanna applied to recover the surplus funds generated by Jackson County’s tax sale of a piece of real property, claiming he was entitled to the proceeds because he was the assignee of a deed of trust secured by the property. The circuit court rejected Rajanna’s application, and instead awarded the excess funds to the property’s record title holder. Rajanna appeals. We affirm. Because a published [684] opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Manager of Revenue of Jackson County v. Hoorfar, 370 S.W.3d 683, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2012 WL 3079141 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

370 S.W.3d 683 (Manager of Revenue of Jackson County v. Hoorfar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.