Man v. Vockroth
121 A. 599, 94 N.J. Eq. 511, 9 Stock. 511, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 695
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance■—Ti-ib Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Williams, Van Buskirk—10.
For reversal—Katzenbaoh—-1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Man v. Vockroth, 121 A. 599, 94 N.J. Eq. 511, 9 Stock. 511, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 695 (N.J. 1923).
121 A. 599 (Man v. Vockroth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Krause v. Taylor
343 A.2d 767 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Liebeskind v. Metal Frame Aquarium Co.
156 A.2d 701 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Leasehold Estates, Inc. v. Fulbro Holding Co.
136 A.2d 423 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Hyland v. Fonda
129 A.2d 899 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Ingling v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.
76 A.2d 76 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
McCullough v. Hartpence
58 A.2d 233 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Tait v. First Federal Savings, C., N.Y.
28 A.2d 764 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Rayhertz, C., Corp. v. Fulton, C., Co.
200 A. 557 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)
National Silk Dyeing Co. v. Grobart
175 A. 91 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Lidgerwood Estates v. Public Service, C., Co.
167 A. 197 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Scott v. Scott
165 A. 727 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Long Branch v. Hoch
138 A. 106 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)