Man Ki Lee v. International Business Machines Corp.

307 A.D.2d 956, 763 N.Y.S.2d 478

This text of 307 A.D.2d 956 (Man Ki Lee v. International Business Machines Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Man Ki Lee v. International Business Machines Corp., 307 A.D.2d 956, 763 N.Y.S.2d 478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated October 30, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on their cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly found that a question of fact exists as to whether the scaffold provided the injured plaintiff with proper protection (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Feuerstein, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 A.D.2d 956, 763 N.Y.S.2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/man-ki-lee-v-international-business-machines-corp-nyappdiv-2003.