Home/Supreme Court/Mamula v. United Steelworkers

Mamula v. United Steelworkers

379 U.S. 17, 85 S. Ct. 148, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 357, 57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 19, 1964
Docket327
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 379 U.S. 17 (Mamula v. United Steelworkers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mamula v. United Steelworkers, 379 U.S. 17, 85 S. Ct. 148, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 357, 57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276 (1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murray v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
734 F. Supp. 655 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Axelrod v. Stoltz
264 F. Supp. 536 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 17, 85 S. Ct. 148, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 357, 57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mamula-v-united-steelworkers-scotus-1964.