Mamula v. United Steelworkers

379 U.S. 17, 85 S. Ct. 148, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 357, 57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 19, 1964·No. 327·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mamula v. United Steelworkers, 379 U.S. 17, 85 S. Ct. 148, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 357, 57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276 (1964).

379 U.S. 17 (Mamula v. United Steelworkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
734 F. Supp. 655 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Axelrod v. Stoltz
264 F. Supp. 536 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)