Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.
833 A.2d 467, 266 Conn. 915, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 425
This text of 833 A.2d 467 (Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mamudovski v. BIC Corp., 833 A.2d 467, 266 Conn. 915, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 425 (Colo. 2003).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 715 (AC 21957), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the plaintiffs negligence claim?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION
857 A.2d 328 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
833 A.2d 467, 266 Conn. 915, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mamudovski-v-bic-corp-conn-2003.