Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance
This text of 52 A.D.2d 873 (Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action on an insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated April 7, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the instant complaint fails to state a cause of action on a third-party beneficiary theory (cf. Embler v Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins. Co., 158 NY 431; Jefferson v Sinclair Refining Co., 14 AD2d 238, affd 10 NY2d 422; Duffy v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 58 Misc 2d 855; Browdy v StateWide Ins. Co., 56 Misc 2d 610). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 A.D.2d 873, 384 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mammi-v-american-policyholders-insurance-nyappdiv-1976.