Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance

Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance

52 A.D.2d 873, 384 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action on an insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated April 7, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the instant complaint fails to state a cause of action on a third-party beneficiary theory (cf. Embler v Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins. Co., 158 NY 431; Jefferson v Sinclair Refining Co., 14 AD2d 238, affd 10 NY2d 422; Duffy v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 58 Misc 2d 855; Browdy v StateWide Ins. Co., 56 Misc 2d 610). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance, 52 A.D.2d 873, 384 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 873 (Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jefferson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
179 N.E.2d 706 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Embler v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance
53 N.E. 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Jefferson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
14 A.D.2d 238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Browdy v. State-Wide Insurance
56 Misc. 2d 610 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Duffy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
58 Misc. 2d 855 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1968)