Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara v. Latoya Michelle Jawara
This text of Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara v. Latoya Michelle Jawara (Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara v. Latoya Michelle Jawara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned October 31, 2011
MAMAKEH MAMADI JAWARA v. LATOYA MICHELLE JAWARA
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 07D2598 Carol Soloman, Judge
No. M2011-02256-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 31, 2011
This is an appeal from a divorce decree entered on August 5, 2008. Because the appellant voluntarily dismissed her first appeal from the same divorce decree in 2008, and did not file her current notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within the time permitted by Tenn. R. App. P. 4, we dismiss the appeal.
Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed
F RANK G. C LEMENT, J R., J., A NDY D. B ENNETT, J., and R ICHARD H. D INKINS, J.
LaToya Michelle Jawara, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara, Antioch, Tennessee, Pro Se.
______________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
The trial court entered a final decree of divorce on August 5, 2008. The wife, LaToya Michelle Jawara, filed a timely notice of appeal to this court. However, on September 4, 2008, Ms. Jawara filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of her appeal pursuant to Tenn. R.
1 Tenn. R. Ct. App. 10 states:
This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case. App. P. 15. The court dismissed the appeal on September 16, 2008. In 2011, Ms. Jawara contacted the clerk of this court about “reopening” her appeal. She was informed that the appeal was over and could not be reopened. Not satisfied with the clerk’s response, on October 11, 2011, Ms. Jawara filed with the trial court clerk a second notice of appeal from the August 5, 2008 order. The trial court clerk transmitted the notice to this court in accordance with Tenn. R. App. P. 5, and the clerk assigned the notice of appeal a new appeal number. On October 24, 2011, this court ordered Ms. Jawara to show cause why this new appeal should not be dismissed. Ms. Jawara has filed a response which sets forth her position regarding the underlying divorce action, but fails to show good cause why the appeal should not be dismissed.
Ms. Jawara’s first appeal was dismissed, at her request, on September 16, 2008. No petition to rehear or Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application was filed, and the time for such filings has long since expired. The first appeal is over and cannot be “reopened.” The notice of appeal filed on October 11, 2011 was untimely. Tenn. R. App. P. 4. Moreover, a party cannot file a new appeal from a judgment which has already been appealed and the appeal dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the trial court’s August 5, 2008 judgment has become final and cannot be appealed.
The appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed to LaToya Michelle Jawara for which execution, if necessary, may issue.
PER CURIAM
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mamakeh Mamadi Jawara v. Latoya Michelle Jawara, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mamakeh-mamadi-jawara-v-latoya-michelle-jawara-tennctapp-2011.