Malval v. Hosten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Malval v. Hosten

275 A.D.2d 735, 713 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9269

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 735 (Malval v. Hosten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malval v. Hosten, 275 A.D.2d 735, 713 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated September 17, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion to set aside a stipulation dated October 12, 1998, vacating their default in answering the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court dated December 3, 1999, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

[736]*736Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly set aside the stipulation vacating the defendants’ default and denied their motion to dismiss the complaint. The defendants failed to answer the complaint within the time provided by the so-ordered stipulation vacating their earlier default (see, Republic Ins. Co. v Northern Aire Dev., 88 AD2d 973). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated September 17, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion to set aside a stipulation dated October 12, 1998, vacating their default in answering the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court dated December 3, 1999, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

[736]*736Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly set aside the stipulation vacating the defendants’ default and denied their motion to dismiss the complaint. The defendants failed to answer the complaint within the time provided by the so-ordered stipulation vacating their earlier default (see, Republic Ins. Co. v Northern Aire Dev., 88 AD2d 973). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 735, 713 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malval-v-hosten-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack