Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corp.
This text of 2 A.D.2d 877 (Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was error in the charge respecting the failure to call one Haley, but we think the error was not of sufficient consequence to warrant reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial. We may not consider the question of privilege since the defendant did not take the necessary steps to develop the evidence or require the submission of the question to the jury by way of request or exception. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 967.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.2d 877, 156 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malus-v-sperry-rand-corp-nyappdiv-1956.