Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corp.

2 A.D.2d 877, 156 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3999
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 A.D.2d 877 (Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corp., 2 A.D.2d 877, 156 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was error in the charge respecting the failure to call one Haley, but we think the error was not of sufficient consequence to warrant reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial. We may not consider the question of privilege since the defendant did not take the necessary steps to develop the evidence or require the submission of the question to the jury by way of request or exception. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 967.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera v. Coughlin
133 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 877, 156 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malus-v-sperry-rand-corp-nyappdiv-1956.