Malus v. Sperry Corp.
282 A.D. 939, 126 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5505
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1953·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent, with leave to the plaintiff to renew application for examination on specific items to be requested. The mere fact that this is a libel action is not determinative of the question of plaintiff’s right to an examination. We note that the libel alleged here is not one that received general publication and that, therefore, there may be difficulty in ascertaining both its extent and effect. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malus v. Sperry Corp., 282 A.D. 939, 126 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
282 A.D. 939 (Malus v. Sperry Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nomako v. Ashton
20 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Dieterle v. Universal Publishing & Distributing Corp.
38 Misc. 2d 973 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Kollsman Instrument Corp. v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
7 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Manacher v. Central Coal Co.
7 A.D.2d 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Leichtentritt v. Leichtentritt
6 Misc. 2d 598 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Bohlinger v. Rosenbaum
6 Misc. 2d 235 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)