Malu v. Security National Insurance Co.
904 So. 2d 501, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7285, 2005 WL 1162071
Opinion
We affirmed the dismissal of the complaint in this case for failure to state a cause of action in Malu v. Security National Insurance Company, 848 So.2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); however, our opinion was reversed by the Florida Supreme Court. Malu v. Security Nat’l Ins. Co., 898 So.2d 69 (Fla.2005). Because our theory for affirming has been reversed, and the trial court’s reason for dismissing the complaint cannot be sustained, Malu, 848 So.2d 373, we reverse the order of dismissal and remand for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malu v. Security National Insurance Co., 904 So. 2d 501, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7285, 2005 WL 1162071 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
904 So. 2d 501 (Malu v. Security National Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.
848 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.
898 So. 2d 69 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)