Malu v. City of Gainesville

872 So. 2d 445, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6666, 2004 WL 1068080
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 2004·No. 1D04-0049·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

872 So.2d 445 (2004)

Steve T. MALU, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Appellee.

No. 1D04-0049.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 13, 2004.

Appellant, pro se.

Thomas M. Gonzalez and Jennifer Zumarraga of Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant's responses to the Court's orders of February 18, 2004, and March 24, 2004, the Court has determined that the order is not final because, although the order grants a motion for summary judgment, it fails to enter judgment. C.f. McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). A determination that "final judgment shall be entered," is insufficient to unequivocally demonstrate finality. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malu v. City of Gainesville, 872 So. 2d 445, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6666, 2004 WL 1068080 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

872 So. 2d 445 (Malu v. City of Gainesville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Walton County
138 So. 3d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
State, Department of Revenue v. Brown
29 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Floyd
872 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)