Malu v. City of Gainesville
This text of 872 So. 2d 445 (Malu v. City of Gainesville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steve T. MALU, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se.
Thomas M. Gonzalez and Jennifer Zumarraga of Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's responses to the Court's orders of February 18, 2004, and March 24, 2004, the Court has determined that the order is not final because, although the order grants a motion for summary judgment, it fails to enter judgment. C.f. McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). A determination that "final judgment shall be entered," is insufficient to unequivocally demonstrate finality. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
872 So. 2d 445, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6666, 2004 WL 1068080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malu-v-city-of-gainesville-fladistctapp-2004.