Maltus v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Maltus v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

91 A. 213, 245 Pa. 71, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 833

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 13, 1914

DocketAppeal, No. 352

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A. 213 (Maltus v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maltus v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 91 A. 213, 245 Pa. 71, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 833 (Pa. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this action against the defendant, a common carrier, for alleged failure to deliver goods to a consignee, the plaintiffs failed to sustain their averment of misdeliveries, while, on the other hand, the defendant showed that proper deliveries had been made. In his charge to the jury, directing them to find for the defendant, the learned trial judge concisely, clearly and correctly presented the situation, and, as we have discovered no error in any of the assignments, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this action against the defendant, a common carrier, for alleged failure to deliver goods to a consignee, the plaintiffs failed to sustain their averment of misdeliveries, while, on the other hand, the defendant showed that proper deliveries had been made. In his charge to the jury, directing them to find for the defendant, the learned trial judge concisely, clearly and correctly presented the situation, and, as we have discovered no error in any of the assignments, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A. 213, 245 Pa. 71, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maltus-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-pa-1914.