Maltina Corporation and Julio Blanco-Herrera v. Cawy Bottling Company, Inc.
This text of 491 F.2d 1391 (Maltina Corporation and Julio Blanco-Herrera v. Cawy Bottling Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the judgment for appellees entered by the district court after our decision on the prior appeal. Maltina Corporation v. Cawy Bottling Company, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 1021. We are now presented with the tag end questions which were resolved by the district court following remand. We conclude that the trademark was not assigned in gross; that the trademark was not abandoned by non-use or otherwise ; and that the district court did not err in concluding that there was an inadequate basis for cancelling the trademark because of the affidavit of use filed pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. § 1058(a).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 F.2d 1391, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maltina-corporation-and-julio-blanco-herrera-v-cawy-bottling-company-inc-ca5-1974.