Maltese v. Hanna
This text of 260 A.D. 904 (Maltese v. Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and orders unanimously [905]*905reversed, with, costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied. Defendant’s answer and papers in opposition to the motion present a question of fact with respect to alleged fraud and deceit in the sale of the lumber which was the consideration for the note sued upon. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 904, 23 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maltese-v-hanna-nyappdiv-1940.